It's great to have a bit more time to go back to my line of questioning.
My understanding from reading AIDA with the amendments that have been proposed is that it requires organizations building general-purpose systems with the ability to generate output to make their best effort and ensure that the output of those systems can be detected easily or with the aid of free software.
That's one. I think that's a step in the right direction. I'm going to ask you in a second, but I want to cover a couple of other things.
It also significantly strengthens the enforcement framework for privacy and requires express and meaningful consent when sensitive personal information is being collected, used or disclosed. That, to me, covers biometric information, which I think would apply to all of your actors, creators, performers and directors, etc. Perhaps there are some exceptions.
It also requires the companies that are creating the AI systems to keep records related to the creation and operation of the systems, which may suggest they have to keep records of how they're training their systems.
I understand that we could go deeper there, and some of you would want that, but those seem to be three significant steps to create greater transparency.
I want to go to ACTRA first. It seems to me that these are really positive steps. Would you not agree that those are very positive steps that have been added to the bill?