We must avoid a race to the bottom. I understand.
You spoke about transparency. The committee has often discussed transparency, such as a person's right to know that they're dealing with an artificial intelligence image or algorithm, for example. However, if I understood you correctly, transparency isn't enough. It shows only our powerlessness against an algorithm. You said something that I found intriguing. If I understood you correctly, individuals must have the opportunity to challenge the fact that they're dealing with an artificial intelligence model.
What individual has the technological and financial ability to challenge these types of models? Is this proposal realistic for the average person, for example?