Maybe I'll speak on this.
The tribunal did not make any order, so with regard to any of the representations made by representatives and witnesses, there's no order to hold them to those representations.
What I can say is that structural presumptions in particular may have changed the way the case was heard, because the way a structural presumption works is.... We would have demonstrated that the merger was concentrative. The burden would have shifted to the parties to demonstrate that the merger was not anti-competitive, instead of us continuing to prove that it is anti-competitive.