Yes, it's a reverse onus, which still leaves the door open. If they can demonstrate it is pro-competitive, that would still be there.
The other addition is the remedy standards. Here we advocated that the remedy of the divestiture of Freedom did not go far enough. The restore standard, which we advocated in our competition submission, would ensure that all of the anti-competitive effects would have to be remedied, not just the part that takes it from the “substantial lessening” of competition to a “lessening” of competition. We think that would have also helped.