I'll go first.
Back to the analogy which prefaced the question, the more apt analogy for the CRTC decision would be seeing one of those auto manufacturers that was mentioned build a plant costing billions of dollars, and the regulator saying you have to give access to that plant to a competing auto manufacturer, so it can build its own automobiles using your technology and your facility.
This is exactly what has happened with the CRTC. In fact, in telecom, the reason Canada has been so successful in being able to provide more accessibility.... There is now wide coverage across the vast land of high quality, world-leading networks at lower prices, because each of the players who are here today, including others who have appeared, had to build their own networks. A fundamental basis of competition in Canada is the competition of networks, the services we can offer over those networks and the innovation that comes with those networks. We then lower prices as a result.
That's what we should be supporting in Canada. It's fundamentally important.