Normally, we have the department that's proposing legislative changes come in front of us. I think the problem we're facing is that we have the Department of Industry here representing the Department of Justice.
Has the Department of Justice provided any written material that you could give to the committee so we can resolve this?
My standing convention is for a department to have representation in front of the committee when it wants amendments. That's the problem here. Basically, a vessel for the justice department has come to the industry committee for this amendment. There's the confusion. Regardless of that, there is a consequence to this change. They wouldn't be asking for this change if there weren't a reason and consequences. If it were convention that it be included, then that's a pretty bold mistake to begin with in the legislation. It has a consequence, as we know.
Is there any written information from the Department of Justice? Can we get anybody from the Department of Justice on the phone for this? I don't know. It's just—