It carries with the bill, so it becomes a part of the piece of legislation, which means that the legislation reads with it, basically, on an ongoing basis. I think inserting the preamble into the bill itself is a very direct mechanism by which to inform its ongoing interpretation, as opposed to the potential that a court look back on the interpretive record. To answer your question, it is a more direct way of ensuring that it continues to be understood in that manner.
On April 8th, 2024. See this statement in context.