Where possible, we seek to have consistency of language both in the obligation and in the ambition. The preamble, obviously, sets the ambition of the bill, and then the obligations of the bill will follow.
As per your previous point, I think the government, through their amendments, intends very much to get at the issue of minors' rights to privacy, but the best interests of the child as a legal obligation, when we get to the obligation section, is a subjective construct that potentially introduces quite a bit of ambiguity with respect to the commercial actor that needs to make a determination on that. It may actually engender quite a bit more collection of personal information in order to understand and interpret what is in the best interests of the child.