In the amendments and in the text of the bill, the construct the government has put in place is both to treat minors' information as sensitive and to authorize parents and guardians to be able to act on behalf of those interests, and then to include the prospect that where the capacity of the minor is understood to be sufficient, they would be able to make determinations in their own right. It's introducing a new construct, the best interests of the child. That would then need to be implemented by commercial actors, which includes what they would need to do with the information and how to treat it.
The amendment proposals that follow essentially get at the fact that it's either the parent or the minor, where there's capacity, as opposed to a construct that may be open to some interpretation.