Allow me to interrupt you. I'm talking about the concept of the best interests of the child because I think that, first and foremost, there was an objective there.
What you are saying is not entirely accurate. I'm trying to understand why, in some cases, ambiguity and recourse to the courts are tolerated, but not in other cases.
Is there, to your knowledge, a single technique that guarantees 100% the inability to identify individuals, without uncertainty or risk?