I wanted to bring in NDP-2, and G-2, which is another amendment the government has proposed. I think you all have it. If NDP-2 is voted through, then G-2 is no longer able to be moved.
I want to bring this in because it perhaps has an impact on the debate we're having and the alignment with Quebec's law, which I think Mr. Garon is rightfully pointing out.
Just understanding why "reasonably foreseeable risk" is something that is needed in order to align with Quebec's law, Mr. Schaan, can you comment on how that concept is relevant but also on how it strengthens privacy protection?