What's the argument for building in “generally accepted best practices” and “reasonably foreseeable”? I understand both may align with Quebec's law, notwithstanding Mr. Garon's point, which I think is a very good one, that perhaps embedding a requirement for things to be specified in regulation may strengthen it further and address some of the concerns from my colleagues across the way. I think they have all expressed the same concern that industry shouldn't be setting the standards for itself and that perhaps, in fact, there should be a regulation. Can you speak to that?
I'm sorry for going on and on. I have a tendency to do that sometimes. To be clear, the question I was asking was what's the argument for having “generally accepted best practices” and “reasonably foreseeable”?