To the point that one of the strengths of including this is that it evolves, I think some of the comments we have heard from others suggest that if it's not an exhaustive list today, in essence that provides some ambiguity that would be taken advantage of, but I think the opposite is the case. The argument could be made that it needs to evolve because the technology and the methods for anonymization are changing quite quickly. How do you ensure that the OPC can...? What's the mechanism for continually updating that? I think that's the clarity a lot of us sound like we need to have in order to feel this is robust enough that it's not going to open that door.
How do we envision the general guidance around generally accepted best practices evolving? Would it be the OPC guidance? Where would the expertise come from?