I don't want to take up too much time, but I do want to say that our questions are exactly the same.
First, it's important to have a definition that's authoritative and legitimate. We don't have one, and we need one.
Second, we've been wondering about the Emergencies Act and police investigations, in particular. I think our questions have been answered.
However, I have another question. You mentioned the legal test stated in the Spencer decision. I need to read the new definition more carefully, but offhand I think it's more appropriate. It adopts exactly the same test as is used in Spencer. So it's already in the case law.
So what's the difference between introducing that test into the law as is and not including a definition?