I want to thank the member for that question.
As we discussed at the meeting on Monday, amendment G-2 comprises two elements.
We had a long discussion about the first of those elements, which was the concept of “generally accepted best practices”. I understood from committee members that they did not see the value in that approach.
The second aspect was the notion of “reasonably foreseeable”, which allows for a standard approach found in many other parts of the law—as we discussed at the last meeting—and for the implementation to be a test, essentially, of whether or not the user of the personal information has a reasonable understanding of its potential for reidentification. I think that's the second construct that would now get inserted back into NDP-2.
Those were the two elements of G-2.