I want to thank the member for that question.
I think our abiding consideration would be that we note and acknowledge the import of R. v. Spencer as a fundamental precept that needs to be understood as it relates to the ongoing interpretation and implementation of the CPPA, in much the same way as it has shaped the implementation of PIPEDA. In that regard, I think this helpful construct, as it relates to the relationship between the CPPA and law enforcement, is a potentially useful area to ensure is well understood.
Our abiding view would be that it should conform to the legal test set out in Spencer.