What proposed section 44 does in the government amendment is to say that for law enforcement in these particular zones, you can't rely on the CPPA itself for a definition of lawful authority. When we're suggesting that you can rely on a reasonable law to be able to have lawful access as a function of law enforcement, that means you can't come back to proposed section 44, which says that law enforcement does these things. You essentially need to exempt proposed section 44 from “reasonable law” under the Spencer test because it's self-referential.
I think the CPC amendment suggests that you can't rely on it in zones other than proposed section 44, and I think the view is that the reasonable law portion is “Law enforcement—request of government institution” in proposed section 44.