—but I wanted to express some rationale as to why setting the age of a minor and defining it in the context of the bill would be a good move. I will just say that from our side, we fully support the amendment he offered.
With regard to Mr. Garon's points, we intend to work on a capability test and on including that in the bill. I think it would modify it slightly and give some ability for minors who are under 18 to exercise their rights over their personal information, if they have the capability of doing so.
Mr. Garon, you and I actually had a conversation about this prior to getting into clause-by-clause. It was brief, I know, but I think it might help you feel more comfortable if “minor” is defined as 18. That's not to say that it's perfectly aligned with your perspective, but we're all having a little bit of water with our wine in this process, I'm sure. I will just say that I respect your point of view, but we will be supporting the definition of under 18 for minors.
Thank you.