I just discussed that with the legislative clerks. Procedurally, it would be a little more elegant if this amendment was defeated and then another one was proposed, instead of subamending, because this is basically rewriting CPC-3 entirely.
I think it's good, Mr. Turnbull, that you put it on the record and that it is being circulated, so that MPs know what alternative you're proposing. It would still, to some extent, respond to some of the concerns that are brought forward by CPC-3. However, procedurally, I don't think we could subamend it the way you're proposing, Mr. Turnbull. I would rather you moved a distinct amendment with what you've proposed.
Go ahead, Mr. Perkins.