In general terms, Nathaniel, as I said earlier—and this is a metaphor—it's singing from the same songbook, understanding and respecting what each jurisdictions holds near and dear to them and what the value proposition is. I mentioned that Ontario's strategy is bold, because we have a rare opportunity from extraction right through to the technology being manufactured here in southern Ontario. That is an extraordinary, one-of-a-kind opportunity.
There are differences as we move across the country, but to the extent that major environmental assessments may come into play, especially as they may pertain to a national interest, it's important we sit down as partners and ensure that we're thinking about it the right way. We understand that our role is not to build mines, but to create the right conditions for communities—including, most notably, indigenous communities—to benefit from them; to be satisfied, from a business, environmental and human resource perspective that we're pulling the right levers at the right time; and providing, at the same time, the kind of business certainty that these large-scale investments require.
I would finish very quickly with the infrastructure piece. I can't stress enough that these legacy infrastructure projects are actually bigger than the mining projects over the course of time. Building the corridor to prosperity is going to provide, arguably, a lot more contemporary jobs and processes, when you think about it, than a mining operation sustained over the course of time.
Being involved as full partners on those kinds of things would make sense to me. We're hearing great things from the federal government on this.