Mr. Chair, I want to thank the member for the question.
I think it would be important to return to page 6 of the bill and clause 4 on “Authorized representatives”, where it clearly notes:
The rights and recourses provided under this Act may be exercised
—and then with the most important part here—
(a) on behalf of a minor by a parent, guardian or tutor, unless the minor wishes to personally exercise those rights and recourses and is capable of doing so;
Essentially, the reversion is to the individual, so that 14-, 15- or 16-year-old who wants to steward their own personal information has the recourse to be able to do so, particularly if they're capable of being able to do so.
It would be the determination of the receiving entity, the commercial actor that would be receiving the personal information, that would need to essentially challenge the assumption of the capability of the individual, which, in the first instance, is probably not the natural recourse, because the individual whose data you're holding is telling you what they want to do with it, and your gut is to go with it, essentially. It would only be if there were any concerns about the potential capability of that individual that would require the corporation to potentially reconsider the determination as to whether or not that person should have recourse.