Indeed.
Unfortunately, the construction of NDP-4, as Mr. Chhabra says, uses “used to identify them”, as opposed to the current definition, which is “about” them. “About” does more than “used to identify” does. “About” suggests a generality around you, which is where inferred information got read in by the courts. Therefore, if we go back to “identify”, if it was individuals that can be used.... The construction is challenging because you need to keep “about” somewhere in there so that you can get at the broader construct.