I think the committee heard from a number of representatives. Fourteen was requested by a number of industry stakeholders. I think you've heard some testimony and some considerations from us as officials that the 15- to 18-year-old area still contains a lot of potentially sensitive information. By moving to 18, you essentially scope in a greater degree of information that is still likely to be sensitive in the same way that information for a minor under 14 would be.
I think the summary is probably the same. You've heard testimony to the effect of why 14 would be useful, particularly from industry, but I think there are also considerations that have been raised about that 15- to 18-year-old range, where it's highly likely that someone is still potentially consenting to information that they may still want rights and recourses to be able to effect as sensitive.