That makes a lot of sense. I know that we haven't gotten to those parts of the bill, so it's easy to reflect on definitions at the point we're at and not consider the very high number of requirements and obligations that companies would be under, given all the personal information that they may use. That's interesting.
If we add Mr. Savard-Tremblay's subamendment to this list, now we're going to “any other information”. I think that almost collapses that outer circle to include almost anything as sensitive information. I see that as being a very high risk for unintended consequences.
Mr. Schaan, could you comment on that?