If you go back to the California code, it says, “Personal information includes, but is not limited to” any information that directly “identifies, relates to, describes, is reasonably capable of being associated with, or could be reasonably linked, directly or indirectly, with a particular consumer or household”. It's a longer definition before they list the examples.
Should we be looking for that kind of a definition? Again, we're talking about “inferred” on one side. However, again, when we look down the list, I think it is the Bloc amendment that talks about including “an identifiable individual or group”.
If we look at the California code, we see that they've really nailed that first part of the definition. Would that be something that would encompass all of the amendments that we looked at?