That's especially for the interpreters who have to wear them day in and day out.
I'll ask the Speaker. I have no problem with that, and I see no objection. Thank you, Mr. Masse.
With regard to our scheduling issue, as you know, before the end of May—as we agreed at the steering committee—we are to have another hour with the minister on Rio Tinto. We also have to invite him before the end of May on the main estimates. The clerk has asked for the minister to appear on both of these subjects. However, the minister, based on his very busy schedule, is only available on May 8 for an hour with the committee. I am seeking the guidance of the committee as to whether we should invite him on the main estimates and open the floor to all subjects or have him specifically on Rio Tinto.
He's prepared to answer questions on both topics, but the time that he has to allocate to the committee is limited. I'm seeking guidance in terms of what I send out for the notice. I know it's not going to be satisfactory to members that we don't have the minister for one hour on Rio Tinto and for one hour on the main estimates. However, the most pressing one, to me, would be.... Well, actually, time is of the essence for both, but I would go with Rio Tinto. That's my personal opinion.
I see Rick Perkins.