I have a point of order.
It's confusing. It's not a subamendment. It's an amendment that's been dropped on the table, and to continue to refer to it as a subamendment confuses people, because a subamendment would actually do something different from what's being proposed by the parliamentary secretary. It's a full on amendment that's actually been tabled as a full on amendment, so it can't continually be referred to as a subamendment, because that's not actually what it is, and calling it that just confuses the heck out of everybody.