Yes. Maybe, just for the benefit of members, I'll go through at least a couple of specific ones and then I'll turn to Mr. Chhabra.
Again, to your first point, it's important that we're not making this a contrast between, as I think I said on Monday, the Wild West and Fort Knox, because essentially the whole goal of the CPPA is to elevate the obligations as it relates to the fundamental protection of the privacy of Canadians through the use of personal information. Just because something's not sensitive doesn't mean that it's a free-for-all. In fact, once we get to the provisions and obligations on corporations that collect, use and disclose personal information, we'll see that there are actually quite a lot of obligations to ensure there is privacy protection within that. I think you want to preserve sensitive information for that which is truly sensitive, for which there's a really high understanding of privacy in that specific case.
In the case of financial data, I think we raised actual Supreme Court jurisprudence that was clear that financial data is not always sensitive. In fact, in RBC v. Trang, the Supreme Court found that “the degree of sensitivity of specific financial information is a contextual determination.” In fact, if financial data, for instance, were to stand in this list, there's a lot of financial data that actually is disclosed between financial institutions for the purposes of processing as a fundamental function of business practice. If that now necessitates, because it's deemed sensitive, the express consent of the individual every single time financial data is disclosed between entities for the purposes of processing, payments and other factors, we'll gum up the overall operations of the current financial transactions.
I'll turn to Mr. Chhabra for some others on the list, but I would say that one has to think about all of the personal information for which now this would require express consent and think about the list in that regard. I may even put sexual habits, for instance, on that list, because there's a lot of information that potentially may disclose someone's sexual habits and that may not necessarily require express consent, particularly from a transaction perspective.
I'll turn to Mr. Chhabra.