I'm trying to understand the effect of this.
We were in a fairly rigorous debate on the definition of “sensitive personal information”. We were clarifying with officials that CPC-7, before the amendment, would have a risk of over-regulation and that it wouldn't necessarily take context into account. Financial information, for example, in some contexts, is not deemed sensitive, and in other contexts, it is deemed sensitive, so there's some risk in having a list of very specific factors that are deemed to be sensitive.
We had suggested subamendments for both CPC-7 and NDP-6. We were prepared to hopefully move something that would help us get towards consensus. We saw the value in both of those amendments, but now we're mashing them together. It's kind of compounding the issues that I have with it.
I want to go to Mr. Schaan to tell us how adding in the end of NDP-6 to the list would actually have an impact on the debate we are having. My preference would have been to deal with them one at a time. It's up to you all, if that's what you want to do.
Mr. Schaan, maybe you could explain what impact this would have.