Going back to page 12 of the bill, under “Form of consent”, it ultimately makes the point I'm trying to make that we can have sensitive information and still allow for a contextual analysis, even though information is deemed sensitive. “Form of consent” on page 12 says:
Consent must be expressly obtained unless, subject to subsection (6), it is appropriate to rely on an individual’s implied consent
I'm stating this in the context of the Supreme Court ruling that was referenced in the last two meetings, which was specifically about implied consent. It must take “into account the reasonable expectations of the individual”—which we haven't discussed, while we've taken a very black-and-white reading of what sensitive information would be—“and the sensitivity of the personal information that is to be collected, used or disclosed.” Later in the bill, what I'm reading is that there is a reasonable expectation built into information that could be deemed sensitive and its commercial applicability.