I was just expressing my appreciation for your work, Mr. Garon, and also for Mr. Masse allowing you to incorporate some of his thinking into the subamendment that you've proposed. This is great. It sounds like we're off to a constructive start.
I have a couple of questions.
One of the debates that we got into last time was around financial data. I know you've included it in your list. Intuitively, I think that financial data seems like it would be sensitive information. However, both the Privacy Commissioner and the Supreme Court disagree with that. They've said that the degree of sensitivity of specific financial information is a contextual determination. I could go on and quote them.
The Supreme Court decision of RBC v. Trang in 2016 has stated explicitly that in not all cases is financial information actually deemed sensitive, or the degree of sensitivity differs depending on the context of its use. Maybe I can go to Mr. Schaan to back me up on this, so that you're not just taking my word for it. The experts and officials are here with us for good reason.
Mr. Schaan, can you add anything to what I've said?