Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you, colleagues.
As a follow-up to what Mr. Turnbull and I just said—and thank you, Mr. Garon, for your amendment—I would like to propose another subamendment to CPC-7, which was originally proposed by Mr. Vis.
It has been circulated. In a minute, I'll read it with the additional words we've just passed.
Just to remind those who may be watching, we're dealing with the definitions section of the bill, and we're adding the definition for the word “sensitive”.
It says:
Sensitive, in relation to information, includes any information about an individual for which the individual generally has a high expectation of privacy, which—
Then we add the word “may” and change the word “includes” to “include”, so it's “which may include, but is not limited to” all the following that's already in the motion: (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and then (f) changes the word “security”, since that's not a Canadian term, to “social insurance”, so it substitutes “insurance” for “security”. Then (g) deletes the word “or” and after (h) there is a new (i), as we discussed, I think, in our last meeting:
(i) geolocation data revealing an individual's location (de nature sensible).
I will leave that as moved.
I will say that during the break we had a consultation with the current and past privacy commissioners, and they're both comfortable with this.