The Quebec model is really very aligned with the model we're proposing. The main difference is that the tribunal is built into the CAI. The act for the CAI establishes several sections that have very clear purposes.
There's an oversight division and an adjudication division.
On top of that is the president's office, which is actually supported by eight administrative judges who act as an appeal mechanism within that. A case can come from the jurisdictional side for an AMP and be appealed. It's the administrative judges who support the president's office who actually can review that decision. It's actually a tribunal system that's built into the organization.
What we are proposing is very much aligned with that model, except there is a structural separation between the two bodies that perform those functions.