I think it's probably best to consider it in two ways.
One, when we talk about the ability to set the administrative monetary penalty, which would be done by the tribunal, I think you're quite right that it is a check-and-balance piece. That is about fairness. That is about expertise in setting the appropriate monetary penalty.
When it comes to the appeals process, again, you're quite right that it would, in effect, speed up the finalization of an outcome compared to what it would be otherwise by following the court system. Because the decisions of the tribunal are final, there is significantly more speed and efficiency and effectiveness in getting to the outcome. One could suggest that actually the OPC's powers and the ability of the commissioner to get to a final decision and to influence what's happening in the market and to get companies to comply are in fact sped up and aided by having a tribunal system rather than having to work through multiple layers of court systems via appeals.