Okay. It's rare for us to agree quickly like that. That's fine. We're off to a strong start.
I have a question: if we were to remove paragraph 107(1)(a), subparagraphs 107(1)(a)(i) and (ii) and the following, what would prevent someone from waiting for the commissioner's report and then using that document in court?
Do you understand what I'm getting at? I feel that, even if we accepted Mr. Masse's proposal, we would be taking away an option from someone. There's nothing to prevent a person from waiting for the commissioner's report and using it in court. However, if a person is in a hurry or if the harm is significant, they can decide to take the steps at their own expense and deal with the delays. It's still a choice.
Could someone still wait for the commissioner's report before filing a civil suit?