Thank you very much. I'm glad to know that Mr. Masse is attentive to my interventions, and I appreciate that.
I was trying to understand, again, the subamendment in relation to CPC-9. This amendment removes the tribunal from the bill, which I understand is pretty central, because the bill was contemplated based on the tribunal being part of the overall legislative framework.
This new subamendment looks like it deletes all of proposed paragraphs (a) and (b) and removes the “if” from page 51 of the English copy, which is 107(1), the private right of action.
What is really the effect of that? That's what I'm trying to understand. Obviously we didn't have any notice of this, so I think it needs to be clarified a little for all of us to make sure we're on the same page.
Thanks.