Thank you.
Just going back to the appointments, I do find it somewhat concerning—even though they are GIC appointments, and we know how GIC appointments work in this country—that only three people would be needed to be experts on privacy. That means up to 50% of the tribunal won't have to be experts. It could be Joe Blow off the street, theoretically, or someone close to whoever is in power at a certain time.
Do you believe or does the department understand that the way the GIC appointment process could work for the tribunal could lead to individuals' being appointed who have no business being on a tribunal that could be responsible for levying significant fines on global corporations?