Again, that's coming from the Supreme Court of Canada. You would think it would carry some weight in terms of our debate if the Supreme Court of Canada itself recognizes the value of administrative dispute mechanisms like the tribunal and that it actually enhances.... Does the tribunal really just enhance access to justice in a sense? I mean, is that a stretch or am I reading too much into it? Is that really what we're sort of saying? That it enhances due process, helps to remove or maintain impartiality or removes bias...?
Can you maybe speak to that? I get that your argument hinges around it. This is part of the disagreement here and the debate we're having. Some are saying that this tribunal is going to add bureaucracy and delay things, and I think that's the opposite of what I hear your expert testimony telling us, which is that it is not going to do that. It's going to be less cumbersome, less expensive and get to a resolution faster.
Could you speak to whether this enhances due process and removes bias?