Thank you for that. It was very helpful. I even learned a couple of things that I wasn't all that clear about prior to this, so thank you for your testimony.
What I'm stuck on here is the comment you made about what's being proposed in terms of the subamendment. If an amendment were to pass and remove the tribunal altogether, it essentially opens up any of the OPC's decisions to constitutional challenges. That seems like it could really erode public confidence in the OPC's decisions and findings.
Would it not do that over time, if that became a fairly regular occurrence? To me, it would be very tough to maintain an OPC with the powers that are contemplated within this bill. Is that not the case?