I think Ms. Angus in fact provided probably the best estimator available, which is to look at how quickly other tribunals are able to get to cases as a way of estimating how this one would operate. You're thinking about a dedicated group of resources with expertise in the issues, who are able to be deployed to cases rapidly. Of course, it depends on how many cases are being brought forward to the tribunal and how active the Privacy Commissioner may be with the new powers granted. It's very difficult to estimate what the overall caseload would be.
The approach that's been taken here is meant to ensure efficiency in at least a couple of ways. One is to have a dedicated group of experts who grow their expertise over time in dealing with these cases so that they're able to move through them much more quickly and efficiently. It's also to avoid follow-on levels of appeal, which is a very significant difference. Because their decisions can only be judicially reviewed, that eliminates many years, potentially, from a follow-on process. In so doing, I think it offers a much more robust yet efficient approach.