Thanks for the question.
I think that's a very interesting case in point, because it is something that we've contemplated through our own analysis. Our assessment of that scenario is that the case would then be referred to the Federal Court, then onward to the Court of Appeal and then potentially onward to the Supreme Court, depending on the facts of the case.
Each layer would review the case de novo, which would lengthen the process. What that means is that somebody who was aggrieved or who believed themselves to have suffered a contravention of the act could wait many years for a satisfactory resolution of the case.