Thank you. I appreciate that.
I only had to hear it once. I appreciate your repeating it, so some of the members can hear it a few more times. Hopefully, that will make a difference, because, again, I want to go back to what I said earlier.
It's the outcome that we're actually trying to accomplish here. It goes back to dealing with fairness, and fairness to people who, to some extent, for the most part, are very hurt by the situations they're finding themselves in, especially some of the youngsters experiencing some of these situations who would otherwise find themselves in a tribunal and/or a court of law.
I have one last question. When discussing tribunals, we've referenced other international jurisdictions. I know I've heard this already—you referred to it—but, again, I do want to be repetitive, and I do not apologize for that because some do need to hear it maybe more than once.
When discussing tribunals, we've referenced other international jurisdictions that do not have.... I'm sorry. They do have privacy tribunals. We've talked a lot about comparisons with the Competition Bureau, but are there other examples, throughout governments, possibly? How are those models used to inform this tribunal, and what benefits have we seen with tribunals in other areas of federal regulation?