Again, I would underline those words: fairness and people. With respect to accessing justice and to be fair to the people, not everyone can afford the process of a court, especially if they're against a Goliath, and especially if that ends up in the court for decades against that Goliath. We can be talking hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, for a person who just doesn't have it. Therefore, there is no fairness for the people.
There is more cost based on more time, versus a tribunal, which offers that fairness and offers, based on the cost, less time and, therefore, less cost. Is that fair to say?