Thank you to all of the witnesses for being here today.
I want to ask Mr. Noseworthy a question.
Maybe I'll start by saying that SDTC is an arm's-length organization that was around for 20 years or so. I understand that this means that the federal minister, his office at the time and the department wouldn't have been intimately involved in the day-to-day operations of the organization. Because it's arm's-length, it was running under a contribution agreement, but I understand that there's some involvement in terms of reporting requirements, etc.
Mr. Noseworthy, I note that, in the report—I think it's page 18 of the Auditor General's report—there's mention in paragraph 6.52 that the foundation did not report to the department on about 91 conflicts of interest. That's documented in the report quite well.
When I'm thinking about this, I'm thinking, okay, how do we make sure that some of these governance issues never come up again as we move forward with a new governance model for SDTC? The minister has already announced that we intend to fold it into the NRC.
I wondered if you could just comment on how we ensure that we put more onus on the organization in the future and the people who will be involved in making future decisions so that this breakdown of communications doesn't happen again.