Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Péladeau, I'll go back to Glentel.
My colleague Mr. Généreux asked some very interesting questions. I agree with him when he plays devil's advocate by saying that there's nothing to prevent you from selling your services elsewhere.
However, as an economist, I believe that the same business practice in two different environments can produce different results.
From what I understand, you're saying that you were a threat to the major players in the west, because you were anticipating price drops and that the joint venture form created by the big two, essentially, was explicitly intended to hinder your entry into this market.
Do you think that was the explicit purpose?
What do you think the effect is on consumers? What could be widely offered to consumers in Manitoba, for example, that wouldn't be now that Glentel has taken those shares?