I can certainly answer your question.
As to whether such agreements could be reached, that's a possibility. That said, there's a clarity issue for the consumer. When consumers go to these stores, they get the impression that they are seeing everything available on the market when it comes to these devices. They have no idea that these stores are controlled by Bell and Rogers.
As was said a little earlier, is it really acceptable that two of the three companies forming an oligopoly be allowed to exclude a new competitor from their operations? Earlier, we talked about the Competition Bureau's powers. I certainly don't know the details of this bill either, but it seems absurd to us that anyone could do that. To us, that amounts to deceiving the consumer.