Yes. The lowering prices for Canadians act was designed to be complementary and was actually put in the system before some of the other legislation were actually proposed.
I'm not going to speak long on this, but I am going to point out that what we did have was testimony after testimony from witnesses, whether it was Mr. Iacobucci, Professor Ross or Mr. Hatfield.... We also had Mr. Bester, and Mr. Boswell from the competition commission, talk about this bill being an add-on and certain parts of it being important for Canadians. There could be some disagreement with some of the stuff that was actually proposed, but there was no disagreement that it was value-added, so I'm perplexed in terms of the support that has not been provided by the Liberals on this. It's unfortunate, because our Competition Act, as we hear it from the competition commissioner, is related to our productivity.
Again we have another missed opportunity, which is, sadly, the history of this place and of this committee in dealing with the act—it takes, basically, a decade to two decades to get fixed. Universally, all of our witnesses—and I asked them across the table several times whether they thought certain parts would actually help to get this changed in Canada—agreed to that, yet we can't find anything in this bill to protect Canadians. I find that an unfortunate, missed opportunity, Mr. Chair.
Thank you for the time.