Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Yes, I think this is a good amendment. You think of the things that are wrong. When you have a police force that's responsible for bringing charges or a decision you would think would be anti-competition, or you think of competition as a whole.... We can talk about this law with the committee and the privacy, but eventually, hopefully, we talk about the Competition Tribunal.
It overturns the ruling and then the organization, Rogers, was able to sue the bureau. That would be like something getting overturned in court and the defendant suing the police force, which happens sometimes when things are really wrong. We say that, under exceptional circumstances, that should happen, but it should not have happened in this case.
Rogers should not have gotten a penny out of the Competition Bureau. The Competition Bureau was doing its job. Of all of them, this is probably, I'll agree, the best amendment that we have coming out of this bill, and we certainly support it.
Thank you.