I thought the chair made it abundantly clear that we were debating the subamendment and not the substantive motion brought by Mr. Perkins or the amendment brought by Mr. Villemure. What we're hearing is completely irrelevant material on the subamendment. I'd like to get to the point, because a number of members want to add to this discussion. We have a number of motions on the table. All will have to come to a vote at some point.
I would just ask the chair to ask the member to get to the point and be relevant.
Thank you.