That's correct. It's just the timeline.
Both of these witnesses have spoken about this at great length. I think the committee should definitely hear from these individuals, but I think two hours each is more time than is needed to get to the bottom of...well, not even get to the bottom of it. I shouldn't say that, because the minister actually acted quickly when the information came to light, and took action on what was happening with the fund.
Certainly, they appeared at the ethics committee shortly after all of this came to light. I think one hour for each of them would be adequate to have parliamentarians ask the questions they wish to ask of them.
I'll leave it there, Chair.
Thank you.